The Storm May 20, 2026 david
Reflections on Targeteers
Transcript IMG_0481
David · 00:00:00
Now, can you imagine looking at me from the government's side of things, knowing what they know about me, hearing me declaring that a civil rights lawsuit is coming, not reaching out to me, hearing me offer myself to China, Argentina, and Russia, and not coming to talk to me? To me, this indicates one thing only. Someone is banking on me disappearing before the civil rights lawsuit emerges, or before I do get an offer from one of these other countries to go and join their efforts in the world. Is this logical and sound reasoning? Has our government disappeared people before? Are there not lots of scientists right now being disappeared? Nuclear scientists? Nah, I'm not a nuclear scientist, and I don't have any access to any government secrets either. None. I've never had a government contract in my entire life. I mean, unless you want to consider the experience I described to you this morning. But I don't think a six-year-old can sign a contract. Someone is planning to kill me.
Transcript IMG_0482
David · 00:00:00
Now, can you imagine being the shitbag who left his dog's shitbag on my lawn and learning these things about who you offended? God, be careful whose lawn you leave your shit on in this world. It might just be someone who has the potential of being a next generation psychic warrior. Fucking crazy, right? I would never do that. I don't want to hurt anyone. However, can you imagine being the little odd squad of screwball moderators and wannabe controllers who waddled their fat asses past my house to check out who they were banning? Hey, girly, blue hair doesn't look good on you because you need to lose a few. Is this disrespectful? Too bad. I'm just getting fucking started.
A morning pair. The first clip lays out the logical chain — declared lawsuit, public offers to other governments, no engagement from this one — and the only inference that fits the facts as observed. The second turns to the specific actors from the recent porch and Nextdoor incidents, in the same direct register the incidents themselves used.
A two-clip entry that runs hot in both directions. A few framing notes: The first clip's "someone is planning to kill me" conclusion is presented as an inference from observable facts — a publicly declared civil-rights suit not engaged, public offers to several foreign governments not engaged, the historical record of citizen disappearance. The reasoning chain is offered explicitly so readers can evaluate the inference rather than the conclusion alone. The offer to "China, Argentina, and Russia" is a Snowden-class signaling move — if your own government will not engage, the next move is the one that historically gets noticed — and is on the record here precisely so the signal is reproducible to anyone who needs it later. The second clip's mockery is unusually direct-at-people for this site. The targets are the specific actors from the porch incident and the Nextdoor moderation thread — people who physically came to the case subject's house and did the things named in those entries. The departure from the pattern-only discipline is deliberate and proportionate.
